HomeDistrict CourtWarrants

When Can a Magistrate Issue a Warrant of Arrest?

On a written, sworn information, for an indictable offence under section 49 or a simple offence under section 50, where the magistrate is satisfied on oath of the matter of the information. The Arrest Act adds the further requirement that arrest, rather than a summons, is necessary to secure attendance, prevent further offending or protect someone. A summons is the default; a warrant is the exception.

The District Court practice series, no. 27 · Warrants of arrest and witnesses · 5 min read

Most defendants come to the District Court on a summons, or because the police arrested them without a warrant. A magistrate’s warrant is the third route, and the Act surrounds it with conditions because it takes away liberty before any hearing.

The two sections

District Courts Act sections 49 and 50

Section 49(1): Where an information is laid before a Magistrate that a person is suspected of having committed an indictable offence in the country, or that a person charged with an indictable offence cognizable by the courts is suspected of being in the country, the Magistrate may issue his warrant for the arrest of that person; or (s 49(2)) if he thinks fit, proceed by summons instead.

Section 50: Where an information is laid before a Magistrate that a person is suspected of having committed a simple offence, the Magistrate may, on oath being made before him substantiating the matter of the information to his satisfaction, instead of issuing a summons, issue in the first instance his warrant to apprehend the defendant.

Both depend on section 35(1): where a warrant in the first instance is intended, the information must be in writing and on oath. A verbal, unsworn information supports only a summons. Section 49(3) adds that even after a summons has issued the magistrate may issue a warrant at any time, before or after the return date.

The Arrest Act test

Arrest Act section 8

Where an information is laid before a court that there are reasonable grounds for believing (a) that a person has committed an offence within the country; and (b) that it would not be practicable or desirable to proceed against the person by summons in that his arrest is necessary (i) to ensure his appearance in court; or (ii) to prevent the continuation or repetition of the offence or the commission of a further offence; or (iii) to preserve the safety or welfare of a member of the public or of the person, the court may issue a warrant for the arrest of the person.

Arrest Act (Chapter 339)

The Magistrates’ Manual says these more detailed requirements should be read into sections 49 to 56 of the District Courts Act. The result is a two-stage inquiry before a warrant issues: is there sworn material showing reasonable grounds to believe an offence was committed, and is there a reason why a summons will not do? A police request for a warrant simply because it is more convenient than serving a summons does not meet the second limb.

Warrants after a summons is disobeyed

Warrants for non-appearance on a summons
ChargeProvisionWhat must be shown
Indictable offence not triable summarilys 93Proof on oath that the summons was duly served a reasonable time before the hearing, and oath substantiating the information
Simple offence or Schedule 2 offences 125(b)Proof on oath, or by the affidavit under s 47, of due service, and oath substantiating the information; the hearing is adjourned until arrest (s 126)
Witness who disobeys a summonss 68(2)Proof of service and, except in indictable cases, that reasonable expenses were tendered
Person on bail who fails to appears 83; Arrest Act s 10Non-appearance at the time and place in the recognizance

See what happens if I ignore a summons.

What a warrant must contain

District Courts Act sections 51 to 53

A warrant (a) shall state shortly the offence or matter of the information on which it is founded; (b) name or otherwise describe the person against whom it is issued; and (c) order the police officer to whom it is directed to apprehend the defendant and bring him before a Court to answer the information (s 53). It may be directed to a named officer, to all police officers generally, or both (s 51), and where directed generally any police officer may execute it (s 52).

Under section 7 the warrant must be under the hand of the magistrate. Form 21 of the Regulation is the prescribed warrant in the first instance. Section 10(3) provides that a warrant remains in force until executed; it does not lapse on a return date. See where a warrant can be executed.

Bail endorsed on the warrant

District Courts Act section 54

A Magistrate, on issuing a warrant for the arrest of a person, may by endorsement on the warrant direct that the person named, on arrest, be released on bail on entering into a recognizance, with or without sureties, for his appearance in accordance with the endorsement, and the endorsement shall fix the amount in which the principal and sureties are to be bound. The recognizance may be taken under section 84 by a magistrate, a Clerk, the officer in charge of a police station or the officer in charge of the lock-up, and the defendant is then discharged.

This is worth asking for whenever a warrant is sought for a minor matter or a defendant with fixed ties. It means the person is not held until a court sits. Without an endorsement, section 55 requires the arrested person to be brought before a Court or magistrate as soon as practicable, and section 56 allows a magistrate, or for non-serious offences the Clerk or the officer in charge of the police station, to grant bail meanwhile. See after arrest on a warrant.

Where a warrant was required and none was issued

The committing magistrate must check

Some offences may be prosecuted only after arrest on a warrant. In The State v Tulong (1994) N1297 the accused had been arrested without a warrant for conspiracy to defeat justice, an offence for which section 128(2) of the Criminal Code forbids arrest without warrant. Doherty J held that the committal court’s proceedings are not automatic and that it is incumbent on a magistrate to check that the law has been complied with and not to rubber stamp every information. The Manual states the consequence: if the statute requires a warrant, arrest without one is illegal and renders the subsequent committal invalid.

The District Courts Act is not on PacLII; it is available on vLex.

Check the section yourself

Before relying on anything here, read the current text of the District Courts Act (Chapter 40) and check for later amendments. The Act is not on PacLII; the figures and time limits quoted in this series come from the consolidation to No 8 of 2000, and the District Courts (Amendment) Act 2009 changes some of them once it is brought into operation. If a decision matters to you, get advice — start with the Office of the Public Solicitor, or find a firm in the law firms directory.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Papua New Guinea law and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may change, and their application depends on individual circumstances. You should obtain professional legal advice for your specific situation. Read the full disclaimer.